VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 vs Sempron 3000+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 3000+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3251not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataC7-M
Power efficiency0.29no data
Architecture codenamePalermo (2001−2005)Esther
Release date1 October 2005 (19 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$50no data

Detailed specifications

Sempron 3000+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache128 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm90 nm
Die size144 mm2no data
Number of transistors63 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 3000+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket939no data
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt20 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3000+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 20 Watt

VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 210% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Sempron 3000+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Sempron 3000+ is a desktop processor while VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3000+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 3000+
Sempron 3000+
VIA C7-M C7-M-2000
C7-M C7-M-2000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 80 votes

Rate Sempron 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 3000+ or VIA C7-M C7-M-2000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.