Pentium III 1200 vs Sempron 2500+

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 2500+ and Pentium III 1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenamePalermo (2001)Tualatin (2000−2002)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)July 2001 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data
Current price$60 (0.8x MSRP)$16.37

Detailed specifications

Sempron 2500+ and Pentium III 1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.75 GHz1.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB8 KB
L2 cache256 KB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size101 mm280 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors63 million44 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 2500+ and Pentium III 1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754370
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt30 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Sempron 2500+ 207
Pentium III 1200 278
+34.3%

Pentium III 1200 outperforms Sempron 2500+ by 34% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 30 Watt

We couldn't decide between Sempron 2500+ and Pentium III 1200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 2500+ and Pentium III 1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 2500+
Sempron 2500+
Intel Pentium III 1200
Pentium III 1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate Sempron 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 57 votes

Rate Pentium III 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 2500+ or Pentium III 1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.