Sempron 3000+ vs Sempron 140

VS

Aggregate performance score

Sempron 140
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 45 Watt
0.31
+63.2%
Sempron 3000+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.19

Sempron 140 outperforms Sempron 3000+ by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 140 and Sempron 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31093251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.650.29
Architecture codenameSargas (2009−2011)Palermo (2001−2005)
Release date22 July 2009 (15 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40$50

Detailed specifications

Sempron 140 and Sempron 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)128 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size117 mm2144 mm2
Number of transistors234 million63 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 140 and Sempron 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3939
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt62 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 140 and Sempron 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 140 and Sempron 3000+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Sempron 140 0.31
+63.2%
Sempron 3000+ 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Sempron 140 486
+62.5%
Sempron 3000+ 299

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.19
Recency 22 July 2009 1 October 2005
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 62 Watt

Sempron 140 has a 63.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 37.8% lower power consumption.

The Sempron 140 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3000+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 140 and Sempron 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 140
Sempron 140
AMD Sempron 3000+
Sempron 3000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 233 votes

Rate Sempron 140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 80 votes

Rate Sempron 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 140 or Sempron 3000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.