Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs Ryzen Z2
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Z2 outperforms Xeon E5-2608L v4 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1290 | 1513 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.75 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.04 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $363 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Z2 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 2 × 6.4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 246.24 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Z2 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 MB + 16 MB | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Z2 and Xeon E5-2608L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Z2 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Z2 and Xeon E5-2608L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1,536 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Z2 and Xeon E5-2608L v4.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.73 | 4.22 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 20 June 2016 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 50 Watt |
Ryzen Z2 has a 35.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Z2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E5-2608L v4 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Z2 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2608L v4 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
