PRO A10-8750B vs Ryzen Z2
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Z2 outperforms PRO A10-8750B by a whopping 755% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 537 | 2238 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 22.58 | 0.78 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) | Godaveri (2014−2016) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 29 September 2015 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Z2 and PRO A10-8750B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 245 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 71 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 2,411 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Z2 and PRO A10-8750B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 | FM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Z2 and PRO A10-8750B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | - | + |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| PowerTune | - | + |
| DualGraphics | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| Out-of-band client management | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| RAID | - | + |
| HSA | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Z2 and PRO A10-8750B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Z2 and PRO A10-8750B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3-2133 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | no data | 512 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Z2 and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen Z2 and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Z2 and PRO A10-8750B.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.87 | 1.74 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 29 September 2015 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 95 Watt |
Ryzen Z2 has a 754.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 239.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Z2 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD PRO A10-8750B in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Z2 is a notebook processor while PRO A10-8750B is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
