Opteron X3216 vs Ryzen Z2 Go
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Z2 Go outperforms Opteron X3216 by a whopping 714% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1032 | 2610 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Series | AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 26.17 | 6.00 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt R (2025) | Excavator (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 10 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Z2 Go and Opteron X3216 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 82 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Z2 Go and Opteron X3216 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Z2 Go and Opteron X3216. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Z2 Go and Opteron X3216 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Z2 Go and Opteron X3216. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 680M | Radeon Rx Series 4CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Z2 Go and Opteron X3216.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.65 | 0.94 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 10 June 2017 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen Z2 Go has a 713.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron X3216, on the other hand, has 86.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron X3216 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Z2 Go is a notebook processor while Opteron X3216 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
