Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 7 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.91 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
Architecture codename | Storm Peak | Merom-2M (2008) |
Release date | 19 October 2023 (less than a year ago) | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | no data |
Current price | $10927 (1.1x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 96 | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 192 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
Bus support | no data | 533 MHz |
L1 cache | 6 MB | no data |
L2 cache | 96 MB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 384 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | Compute Die (CCD) Size 71 mm2, I/O Die (IOD) Size 388 mm2 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 78,840 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | sTR5 | P |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | no data |
AVX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron Dual-Core T1400.
PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by 2545% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX by 493% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 19 October 2023 | 1 May 2008 |
Physical cores | 96 | 2 |
Threads | 192 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.