EPYC 9175F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 350 Watt
51.00
+24.4%
EPYC 9175F
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
41.01

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX outperforms EPYC 9175F by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4073
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.207.47
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.9812.29
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Turin (2024)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,649$4,256

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has 130% better value for money than EPYC 9175F.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed4.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size4x 71 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors26,280 million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketsTR5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 51.00
+24.4%
EPYC 9175F 41.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 81819
+24.4%
EPYC 9175F 65792

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.00 41.01
Recency 19 October 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 320 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has a 24.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 9.4% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 9175F in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
AMD EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9175F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 12 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9175F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 9175F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.