EPYC 8224P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 350 Watt
50.91
+79.1%
EPYC 8224P
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 160 Watt
28.43

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX outperforms EPYC 8224P by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 8224P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.8427.92
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.7716.82
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)18 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,649$855

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8224P has 76% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 8224P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed4.2 GHz2.55 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die size4x 71 mm22x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors26,280 million17,750 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 8224P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketsTR5SP6
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 8224P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 8224P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 8224P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 8224P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12896

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 50.91
+79.1%
EPYC 8224P 28.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 80865
+79.1%
EPYC 8224P 45160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.91 28.43
Recency 19 October 2023 18 September 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 160 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has a 79.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

EPYC 8224P, on the other hand, has 118.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 8224P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and EPYC 8224P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
AMD EPYC 8224P
EPYC 8224P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX or EPYC 8224P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.