Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX vs EPYC 8224P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8224P
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 160 Watt
25.92
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
2025
64 cores / 128 threads, 350 Watt
89.19
+244%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX outperforms EPYC 8224P by a whopping 244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2215
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.506.39
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.8210.73
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Shimada Peak (2025)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)23 July 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$855$7,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8224P has 377% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads48128
Base clock speed2.55 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size2x 73 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors17,750 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes96136

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8224P 25.92
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX 89.19
+244%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8224P 45421
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX 156305
+244%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.92 89.19
Recency 18 September 2023 23 July 2025
Physical cores 24 64
Threads 48 128
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 8224P has 118.8% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX, on the other hand, has a 244.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 8224P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8224P
EPYC 8224P
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.