EPYC 7343 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 280 Watt
31.65
+15%
EPYC 7343
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
27.52

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX outperforms EPYC 7343 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and EPYC 7343 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking132176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.03
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.6513.65
Architecture codenameChagall PRO (2022)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date8 March 2022 (2 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and EPYC 7343 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier4032
L1 cache1 MB1 MB
L2 cache8 MB8 MB
L3 cache64 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm+
Die size4x 81 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors16,600 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and EPYC 7343 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketWRX8SP3
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt190 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and EPYC 7343. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and EPYC 7343 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and EPYC 7343. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and EPYC 7343.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX 31.65
+15%
EPYC 7343 27.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX 50096
+15%
EPYC 7343 43561

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX 2138
+39.5%
EPYC 7343 1533

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX 16083
+34.8%
EPYC 7343 11934

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.65 27.52
Recency 8 March 2022 12 January 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 190 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has a 15% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

EPYC 7343, on the other hand, has 47.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7343 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and EPYC 7343, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
AMD EPYC 7343
EPYC 7343

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 32 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX or EPYC 7343, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.