Ryzen Embedded V2748 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen Embedded V2748 by a whopping 238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 115 | 831 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 5.35 | 12.66 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 14 July 2020 (5 years ago) | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Ryzen Embedded V2748 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 4.25 GHz |
| Multiplier | 35 | 29 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 74 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Ryzen Embedded V2748 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | sWRX8 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Ryzen Embedded V2748. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Ryzen Embedded V2748 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Ryzen Embedded V2748. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 68.269 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Ryzen Embedded V2748.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 35.32 | 10.46 |
| Recency | 14 July 2020 | 10 November 2020 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 8 |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has a 237.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Ryzen Embedded V2748, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 700% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded V2748 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
