Xeon 6747P vs 3015e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

3015e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.49
Xeon 6747P
2025
48 cores / 96 threads, 330 Watt
57.31
+3746%

Xeon 6747P outperforms 3015e by a whopping 3746% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking232730
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)no data
Power efficiency10.527.36
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenamePollock (Zen) (2020)no data
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

3015e and Xeon 6747P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads496
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache4 MB288 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C78 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on 3015e and Xeon 6747P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT5FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt330 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015e and Xeon 6747P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

3015e and Xeon 6747P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3015e and Xeon 6747P are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015e and Xeon 6747P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3015e and Xeon 6747P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data88

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

3015e 1.49
Xeon 6747P 57.31
+3746%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

3015e 2621
Samples: 61
Xeon 6747P 100964
+3752%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 57.31
Recency 4 August 2020 1 January 2025
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 4 96
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 330 Watt

3015e has 5400% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6747P, on the other hand, has a 3746.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6747P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD 3015e in performance tests.

Be aware that 3015e is a notebook processor while Xeon 6747P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3015e
3015e
Intel Xeon 6747P
Xeon 6747P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 36 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6747P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors 3015e and Xeon 6747P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.