EPYC 7513 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
40.89
+6.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms EPYC 7513 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7513 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking5471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.987.85
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Milan (2021)
Release date7 November 2019 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999$2,840
Current price$1675 (0.8x MSRP)$4189 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 205% better value for money than EPYC 7513.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7513 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.65 GHz
Bus support8 × 16 GT/sno data
L1 cache2 MB2 MB
L2 cache16 MB16 MB
L3 cache128 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistors23540 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7513 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7513. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7513 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7513. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7513.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 40.89
+6.7%
EPYC 7513 38.33

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms EPYC 7513 by 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63243
+6.7%
EPYC 7513 59285

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms EPYC 7513 by 7% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.89 38.33
Recency 7 November 2019 12 January 2021
Cost $1999 $2840
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 200 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7513.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7513 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7513, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 343 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or EPYC 7513, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.