Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads
40.91
+2801%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G3900 by a whopping 2801% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking542100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.190.18
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date25 November 2019 (4 years ago)1 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999$42
Current price$1675 (0.8x MSRP)$105 (2.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 13339% better value for money than Celeron G3900.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads642
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus support8 × 16 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data150 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size256 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics 510
Max video memory-64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency-950 MHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP-4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGA-N/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 40.91
+2801%
Celeron G3900 1.41

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G3900 by 2801% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63273
+2794%
Celeron G3900 2186

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G3900 by 2794% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 1637
+181%
Celeron G3900 582

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G3900 by 181% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 14008
+1308%
Celeron G3900 995

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G3900 by 1308% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.91 1.41
Recency 25 November 2019 1 September 2015
Physical cores 32 2
Threads 64 2
Cost $1999 $42
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 51 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron G3900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 343 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 192 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or Celeron G3900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.