A4 PRO-7350B vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018, $1,799
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
18.12
+1959%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms A4 PRO-7350B by a whopping 1959% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3902780
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.69no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency7.771.45
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)31 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and A4 PRO-7350B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads642
Base clock speed3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache64 MBno data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die size213 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and A4 PRO-7350B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket TR4FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and A4 PRO-7350B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and A4 PRO-7350B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and A4 PRO-7350B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count-3
จำนวนพาธไลน์-192
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and A4 PRO-7350B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and A4 PRO-7350B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-DirectX® 12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and A4 PRO-7350B.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 18.12
+1959%
A4 PRO-7350B 0.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 31953
+1969%
Samples: 361
A4 PRO-7350B 1544
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.12 0.88
Recency 13 August 2018 31 July 2014
Physical cores 32 2
Threads 64 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has a 1959.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

A4 PRO-7350B, on the other hand, has 284.6% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4 PRO-7350B in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
AMD A4 PRO-7350B
A4 PRO-7350B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 83 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 12 votes

Rate A4 PRO-7350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and A4 PRO-7350B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.