Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018
24 cores / 48 threads, 250 Watt
19.40
+3.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen 7 7840HS by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen 7 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking272287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.70no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release date2 October 2018 (5 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,299no data
Current price$450 (0.3x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen 7 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm4 nm
Die size213 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen 7 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket TR4FP8
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen 7 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen 7 7840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen 7 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen 7 7840HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 19.40
+3.6%
Ryzen 7 7840HS 18.73

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen 7 7840HS by 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 30009
+3.6%
Ryzen 7 7840HS 28969

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen 7 7840HS by 4% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 1234
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2386
+93.4%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 93% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 7309
Ryzen 7 7840HS 11134
+52.3%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 52% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 5241
Ryzen 7 7840HS 7642
+45.8%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 46% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 37522
Ryzen 7 7840HS 47933
+27.7%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 28% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 11073
Ryzen 7 7840HS 15663
+41.5%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 41% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 4.16
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2.64
+57.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen 7 7840HS by 58% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 22
Ryzen 7 7840HS 30
+38.8%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 39% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 4376
+70.1%
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2573

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen 7 7840HS by 70% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 173
Ryzen 7 7840HS 279
+61%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 61% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 1.9
Ryzen 7 7840HS 3.31
+74.2%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 74% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 12.2
Ryzen 7 7840HS 14.8
+21.3%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 21% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 4261
Ryzen 7 7840HS 7064
+65.8%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 66% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 117
Ryzen 7 7840HS 147
+25.9%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 26% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 202
Ryzen 7 7840HS 290
+43.4%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 43% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.40 18.73
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen 7 7840HS.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen 7 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 13 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1281 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX or Ryzen 7 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.