Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.63
Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
16.76
+0.8%

Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2699A v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking410404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.962.27
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency8.4210.54
Architecture codenameZEN+ (2018−2019)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date3 October 2018 (6 years ago)25 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649$4,938

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 339% better value for money than Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2699A v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads2444
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier3524
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)5.5 MB
L3 cache32 MB55 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2699A v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP3r2FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2699A v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2699A v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2699A v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2699A v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiB1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2699A v4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.63
Xeon E5-2699A v4 16.76
+0.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25444
Xeon E5-2699A v4 25654
+0.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 1278
+8.6%
Xeon E5-2699A v4 1177

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 7364
Xeon E5-2699A v4 9546
+29.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.63 16.76
Recency 3 October 2018 25 October 2016
Physical cores 12 22
Threads 24 44
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 145 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2699A v4, on the other hand, has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score, 83.3% more physical cores and 83.3% more threads, and 24.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2699A v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2699A v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 71 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 42 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2920X or Xeon E5-2699A v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.