Ultra X9 378H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 635 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.28 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Intel Panther Lake |
| Power efficiency | 3.37 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | ZEN+ (2018−2019) | Panther Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 6 August 2018 (7 years ago) | 5 April 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core Ultra X9 378H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.125 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 12.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 18 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 2 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9600 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core Ultra X9 378H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | SP3r2 | FCBGA2540 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core Ultra X9 378H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core Ultra X9 378H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core Ultra X9 378H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 93.867 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 August 2018 | 5 April 2026 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 16 |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 2 nm |
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 50% more threads.
Ultra X9 378H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 33% more physical cores, and a 500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Intel Core Ultra X9 378H. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a desktop processor while Core Ultra X9 378H is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
