Ryzen 9 3900X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1998X

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Ryzen 9 3900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated268
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.82
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiencyno data18.51
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Ryzen 9 3900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threadsno data24
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)768 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache32768 KB64 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Ryzen 9 3900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2AM4
Power consumption (TDP)0 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Ryzen 9 3900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Ryzen 9 3900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Ryzen 9 3900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

Ryzen Threadripper 1998X has 33.3% more physical cores.

Ryzen 9 3900X, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Ryzen 9 3900X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Ryzen 9 3900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1998X
Ryzen Threadripper 1998X
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1998X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5124 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1998X or Ryzen 9 3900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.