Ryzen 9 3900X vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1605B by a whopping 389% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1293 | 238 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.97 | 33.30 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Embedded | AMD Ryzen 9 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) | 7 July 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $499 |
| Current price | $525 | $403 (0.8x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 9 3900X has 1590% better value for money than Ryzen Embedded V1605B.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | 19,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP5 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 51.196 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1605B by 389% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1605B by 389% in Passmark.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1605B by 366% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1605B by 62% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.32 | 21.11 |
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 7 July 2019 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded V1605B in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
