Processor N200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1950
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
14.27
+809%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads, 6 Watt
1.57

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 809% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking4742022
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.99no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Alder Lake-N
Release date29 July 2017 (6 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$396 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads3244 x 3.7  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed3.2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache32 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors9,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3r2Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.27 1.57
Recency 29 July 2017 3 January 2023
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 6 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 20 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 110 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.