Athlon II Neo K345 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017, $799
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
13.10
+4267%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Athlon II Neo K345 by a whopping 4267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6413373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD Athlon II Neo
Power efficiency7.82no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date10 August 2017 (8 years ago)18 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon II Neo K345 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2000 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache32 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors9,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon II Neo K345 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSP3r2S1
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt1 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon II Neo K345. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, PowerNow, HyperTransport 3.0
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon II Neo K345 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon II Neo K345. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon II Neo K345.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 13.10
+4267%
Athlon II Neo K345 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 23146
+4292%
Samples: 757
Athlon II Neo K345 527
Samples: 11

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.10 0.30
Recency 10 August 2017 18 December 2010
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 1 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a 4266.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon II Neo K345, on the other hand, has 17900% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon II Neo K345 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a desktop processor while Athlon II Neo K345 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
AMD Athlon II Neo K345
Athlon II Neo K345

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 441 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Athlon II Neo K345 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon II Neo K345, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.