Athlon 64 FX-55 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017, $799
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
13.13
+5609%
Athlon 64 FX-55
2004, $180
1 core / 1 thread, 104 Watt
0.23

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Athlon 64 FX-55 by a whopping 5609% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6413451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency7.830.24
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date13 July 2017 (8 years ago)10 October 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799$180

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon 64 FX-55 have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon 64 FX-55 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads241
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache1.125 MB128 KB
L2 cache6 MB1 MB
L3 cache32 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm130 nm
Die size213 mm2193 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data63 °C
Number of transistors9600 Million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon 64 FX-55 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2939
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt104 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon 64 FX-55. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon 64 FX-55 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon 64 FX-55. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR1 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon 64 FX-55.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 13.13
+5609%
Athlon 64 FX-55 0.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 23155
+5631%
Samples: 762
Athlon 64 FX-55 404
Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.13 0.23
Recency 13 July 2017 10 October 2004
Physical cores 12 1
Threads 24 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 104 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a 5608.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 FX-55, on the other hand, has 73.1% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
Athlon 64 FX-55

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 441 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Athlon 64 FX-55, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.