Opteron X3216 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Embedded V1605B outperforms Opteron X3216 by a whopping 350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1654 | 2838 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Workstation |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Embedded | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.89 | 2.42 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Excavator (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) | 10 June 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Opteron X3216 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 82 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Opteron X3216 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FP5 | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Opteron X3216. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Opteron X3216 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Opteron X3216. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz) | Radeon Rx Series 4CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Opteron X3216.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.87 | 0.86 |
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 10 June 2017 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Ryzen Embedded V1605B has a 350% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron X3216 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen Embedded V1605B is a desktop processor while Opteron X3216 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
