Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 392 | 521 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | 13.89 | 18.46 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Strix Halo (2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | no data | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FP7/FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.97 | 15.20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has a 18.2% higher aggregate performance score.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, on the other hand, has 57.1% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
