E2-2000 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 outperforms E2-2000 by a whopping 7607% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 323 | 3415 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD E-Series |
| Power efficiency | 16.88 | 0.66 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Gorgon Point (2026) | Zacate (2011−2013) |
| Release date | no data | 6 January 2013 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and E2-2000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 1.75 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 40 nm |
| Die size | no data | 75 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and E2-2000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and E2-2000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and E2-2000 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and E2-2000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7340 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.58 | 0.28 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 18 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has a 7607.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
E2-2000, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E2-2000 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
