Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Place in the ranking	288	2712
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)	Core 2 Extreme (Desktop)
Power efficiency	34.07	0.87
Architecture codename	Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)	Conroe (2006−2007)
Release date	25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)	no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	12 (Dodeca-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	24	2
Base clock speed	2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	5.1 GHz	2.93 GHz
Bus rate	no data	1066 MHz
L2 cache	12 MB	no data
L3 cache	24 MB	no data
Chip lithography	4 nm	65 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	no data	-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	FP8	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	54 Watt	75 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A	no data
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR5

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon 890M

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.44
+2717%

Core 2 Extreme X6800 0.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 30886
+2721%

Core 2 Extreme X6800 1095

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.44	0.69
Physical cores	12	2
Threads	24	2
Chip lithography	4 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	54 Watt	75 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 2717.4% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X6800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Extreme X6800 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Extreme X6800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.