Celeron U3400 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking288not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)Intel Celeron
Power efficiency34.07no data
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache12 MB512 KB
L3 cache24 MB2 MB
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP8BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron U3400 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-800
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890MIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron U3400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron U3400.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 30886
+5886%
Celeron U3400 516

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2024 24 May 2010
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 18 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has an age advantage of 14 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron U3400, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron U3400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Celeron U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.