Turion 64 MT-28 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 outperforms Turion 64 MT-28 by a whopping 12350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 341 | 3557 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 76.22 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point (2024−2025) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| Release date | July 2024 (1 year ago) | June 2005 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Turion 64 MT-28 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 54 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 233 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Turion 64 MT-28 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 512 KB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Turion 64 MT-28. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Turion 64 MT-28 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Turion 64 MT-28. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 890M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Turion 64 MT-28.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.92 | 0.16 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 1 |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 512 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a 12350% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 1728.6% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 MT-28 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
