Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 9850HX outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 487 | 185 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) |
| Power efficiency | 18.91 | 27.65 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Ryzen 9 9850HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 960 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | no data |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Ryzen 9 9850HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz) | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.55 | 29.24 |
| Integrated graphics card | 16.35 | 2.61 |
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has 526.4% faster integrated GPU, and 28.6% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 9850HX, on the other hand, has a 88% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
