EPYC 7352 vs Ryzen 9 9955HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 9955HX
2025
16 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
36.52
+45.4%
EPYC 7352
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
25.11

Ryzen 9 9955HX outperforms EPYC 7352 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking114247
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.57
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)AMD EPYC
Power efficiency64.1915.63
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameFire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 9955HX and EPYC 7352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3248
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache1.3 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 9955HX and EPYC 7352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 9955HX and EPYC 7352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 9955HX and EPYC 7352 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 9955HX and EPYC 7352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 9 9955HX 36.52
+45.4%
EPYC 7352 25.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 9 9955HX 58711
+45.4%
EPYC 7352 40370

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.52 25.11
Recency 6 January 2025 7 August 2019
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 48
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 155 Watt

Ryzen 9 9955HX has a 45.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 181.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7352, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 7352 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 9955HX is a notebook processor while EPYC 7352 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
Ryzen 9 9955HX
AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 18 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 9955HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 9 9955HX and EPYC 7352, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.