Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 9 8945H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 8945H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
19.18
+74%
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
11.02

Ryzen 9 8945H outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 7 2700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking305707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.40
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency40.139.88
Architecture codenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date6 December 2023 (1 year ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 7 2700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.35 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache512 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm12 nm
Die size178 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 7 2700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8AM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 7 2700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMESSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 7 2700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 7 2700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 7 2700X.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 8945H 19.18
+74%
Ryzen 7 2700X 11.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 8945H 30468
+74%
Ryzen 7 2700X 17512

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 9 8945H 7594
+44.5%
Ryzen 7 2700X 5256

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 9 8945H 46572
+34%
Ryzen 7 2700X 34763

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 9 8945H 15476
+45.4%
Ryzen 7 2700X 10643

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 9 8945H 2.63
+32.3%
Ryzen 7 2700X 3.48

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 9 8945H 29
+56%
Ryzen 7 2700X 19

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 8945H 2691
+52.7%
Ryzen 7 2700X 1762

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 8945H 284
+61.6%
Ryzen 7 2700X 176

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 8945H 3.28
+68.2%
Ryzen 7 2700X 1.95

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 9 8945H 15.1
+42.5%
Ryzen 7 2700X 10.6

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 9 8945H 150
+43.6%
Ryzen 7 2700X 105

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 9 8945H 292
+28.9%
Ryzen 7 2700X 227

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 9 8945H 7542
+57.8%
Ryzen 7 2700X 4779

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 8945H 11980
+70.6%
Ryzen 7 2700X 7022

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 8945H 1994
+69.4%
Ryzen 7 2700X 1177

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 8945H 6664
+43.4%
Ryzen 7 2700X 4647

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 8945H 72851
+59%
Ryzen 7 2700X 45814

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.18 11.02
Recency 6 December 2023 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 105 Watt

Ryzen 9 8945H has a 74% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 8945H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 2700X in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 8945H is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 7 2700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
Ryzen 9 8945H
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 8945H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2947 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 8945H or Ryzen 7 2700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.