Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 9 8945H

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 8945H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
18.96
+245%
Ryzen 5 2400G
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.49

Ryzen 9 8945H outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 5 2400G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3061151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.02
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency39.877.99
Architecture codenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)12 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$169

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 5 2400G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache512 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 5 2400G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8AM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 5 2400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 5 2400G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 5 2400G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1250 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 5 2400G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 8945H 18.96
+245%
Ryzen 5 2400G 5.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 8945H 30112
+245%
Ryzen 5 2400G 8727

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 9 8945H 7594
+58%
Ryzen 5 2400G 4805

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 9 8945H 46572
+122%
Ryzen 5 2400G 21024

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 9 8945H 15476
+132%
Ryzen 5 2400G 6672

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 9 8945H 2.63
+162%
Ryzen 5 2400G 6.9

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 9 8945H 29
+208%
Ryzen 5 2400G 9

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 8945H 2691
+218%
Ryzen 5 2400G 847

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 8945H 284
+82.5%
Ryzen 5 2400G 156

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 8945H 3.28
+85.3%
Ryzen 5 2400G 1.77

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 9 8945H 15.1
+190%
Ryzen 5 2400G 5.2

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 9 8945H 150
+213%
Ryzen 5 2400G 48

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 9 8945H 292
+70.3%
Ryzen 5 2400G 172

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 9 8945H 7542
+96.1%
Ryzen 5 2400G 3846

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 8945H 11980
+208%
Ryzen 5 2400G 3885

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 8945H 182
Ryzen 5 2400G 551
+202%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 8945H 1994
+99.2%
Ryzen 5 2400G 1001

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 8945H 6664
+70.5%
Ryzen 5 2400G 3909

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 8945H 72851
+266%
Ryzen 5 2400G 19885

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 8945H 309
+81.5%
Ryzen 5 2400G 170

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.96 5.49
Integrated graphics card 18.33 5.47
Recency 6 December 2023 12 February 2018
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 9 8945H has a 245.4% higher aggregate performance score, 235.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 8945H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2400G in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 8945H is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2400G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen 5 2400G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
Ryzen 9 8945H
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Ryzen 5 2400G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 8945H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1446 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 8945H or Ryzen 5 2400G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.