Celeron 925 vs Ryzen 9 7940HX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7940HX outperforms Celeron 925 by a whopping 11635% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 168 | 3375 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 23.45 | 0.31 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | no data |
| Release date | 17 January 2024 (1 year ago) | 1 January 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7940HX and Celeron 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 32 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7940HX and Celeron 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FL1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Celeron 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 9 7940HX and Celeron 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Celeron 925 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Celeron 925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Celeron 925.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 30.51 | 0.26 |
| Recency | 17 January 2024 | 1 January 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7940HX has a 11634.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 925, on the other hand, has 57.1% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 925 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
