Apple M4 Max (16 cores) vs Ryzen 9 7940HX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7940HX outperforms Apple M4 Max (16 cores) by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 7940HX and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 113 | 168 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) | Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 58.54 | 29.41 |
| Architecture codename | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | no data |
| Release date | 17 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7940HX and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 4.51 GHz |
| L1 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9900 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7940HX and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FL1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 90 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz) | Apple M4 40-core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 34.02 | 27.97 |
| Recency | 17 January 2024 | 30 October 2024 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 90 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7940HX has a 21.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 63.6% lower power consumption.
Apple M4 Max (16 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 9 7940HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Max (16 cores) in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7940HX and Apple M4 Max (16 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
