Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Ryzen 9 7900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7900X
2022
12 cores / 24 threads, 170 Watt
33.52
+128%

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Ryzen 5 7640HS by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking103457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.43no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen4)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release date27 September 2022 (1 year ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$511 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed4.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.6 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size2x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °Cno data
Number of transistorsCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FP8
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions5 nm (CCD), 6 nm (I/O) nm, 0.650 - 1.475VDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 7640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)AMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 7640HS.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes2420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7900X 33.52
+128%
Ryzen 5 7640HS 14.68

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Ryzen 5 7640HS by 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 7900X 51839
+128%
Ryzen 5 7640HS 22706

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Ryzen 5 7640HS by 128% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 7900X 2926
+27.4%
Ryzen 5 7640HS 2297

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Ryzen 5 7640HS by 27% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 7900X 17859
+97.7%
Ryzen 5 7640HS 9035

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Ryzen 5 7640HS by 98% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 7900X 4821
+132%
Ryzen 5 7640HS 2079

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Ryzen 5 7640HS by 132% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 7900X 323
+19.2%
Ryzen 5 7640HS 271

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Ryzen 5 7640HS by 19% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.52 14.68
Integrated graphics card 4.34 15.30
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7640HS in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 7900X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7640HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
Ryzen 9 7900X
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 889 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 314 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7900X or Ryzen 5 7640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.