Ryzen 9 8945HS vs Ryzen 9 7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7900
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
31.60
+66.6%

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 9 8945HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking115282
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation66.59no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Release date14 January 2023 (1 year ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$487 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 9 8945HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size2x 71 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °Cno data
Number of transistors13,140 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 9 8945HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 9 8945HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475VDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 9 8945HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 9 8945HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 9 8945HS.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes2420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7900 31.60
+66.6%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 18.97

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 7900 48880
+66.6%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 29343

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 67% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 7900 2836
+18.8%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 2387

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 19% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 7900 16848
+43.7%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 11721

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 44% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 9 7900 8339
+7.1%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 7786

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 7% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 7900 60934
+23.6%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 49299

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 24% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 7900 19451
+24%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 15691

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 24% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 9 7900 2.98
+47%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 4.38

Ryzen 9 8945HS outperforms Ryzen 9 7900 by 47% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 9 7900 45
+45.8%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 31

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 46% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 7900 4020
+51.2%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 2659

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 51% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 7900 315
+12.1%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 281

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 12% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 9 7900 3.68
+7.6%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 3.42

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 8% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7900 21.5
+40.1%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 15.4

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 40% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7900 10154
Ryzen 9 8945HS 14109
+38.9%

Ryzen 9 8945HS outperforms Ryzen 9 7900 by 39% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7900 207
+37.4%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 151

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 37% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7900 356
+19.3%
Ryzen 9 8945HS 298

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 9 8945HS by 19% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.60 18.97
Integrated graphics card 4.34 18.35
Recency 14 January 2023 6 December 2023
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 8945HS in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 7900 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 8945HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 9 8945HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7900
Ryzen 9 7900
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
Ryzen 9 8945HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 229 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 78 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 8945HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7900 or Ryzen 9 8945HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.