Processor N97 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900X
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
25.33
+654%
Processor N97
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads, 12 Watt
3.36

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by a whopping 654% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900X and Processor N97 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1741488
Place by popularitynot in top-10052
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.42no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Architecture codenameVermeer (Zen3) (2020)Alder Lake-N
Release date5 November 2020 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549no data
Current price$351 (0.6x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900X and Processor N97 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads2444 x 3.6  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache64 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm10 nm
Die size2x 80.7 + 125 (I/O) mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900X and Processor N97 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and Processor N97. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 5900X and Processor N97 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and Processor N97 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and Processor N97. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and Processor N97.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900X 25.33
+654%
Processor N97 3.36

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 654% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 9 5900X 6828
+25.4%
Processor N97 5445

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 25% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 5900X 52076
+240%
Processor N97 15323

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 240% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 5900X 16438
+154%
Processor N97 6461

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 154% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 9 5900X 42
+600%
Processor N97 6

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 600% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 5900X 2695
+463%
Processor N97 479

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 463% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 5900X 250
+55.3%
Processor N97 161

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 55% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 9 5900X 3.14
+61.9%
Processor N97 1.94

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 62% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 5900X 21.2
+631%
Processor N97 2.9

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 631% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 5900X 13361
+476%
Processor N97 2321

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 476% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 5900X 191
+448%
Processor N97 35

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 448% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 5900X 335
+91.6%
Processor N97 175

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Processor N97 by 92% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.33 3.36
Recency 5 November 2020 3 January 2023
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 44 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 12 Watt

The Ryzen 9 5900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N97 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 5900X is a desktop processor while Processor N97 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900X and Processor N97, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
Intel Processor N97
Processor N97

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3169 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 91 vote

Rate Processor N97 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900X or Processor N97, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.