EPYC 7662 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900X
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
25.37
EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
46.89
+84.8%

EPYC 7662 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900X by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 7662 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19341
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.26no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameVermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date5 November 2020 (3 years ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 7662 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads24128
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier3720
L1 cache64K (per core)4 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)32 MB
L3 cache64 MB256 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size2x 74 mm2(CCD) + 125 mm2 (IOD)no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors0 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 7662 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 7662. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 7662 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 7662. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 7662.

PCIe version4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900X 25.37
EPYC 7662 46.89
+84.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5900X 39125
EPYC 7662 72298
+84.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.37 46.89
Recency 5 November 2020 19 February 2020
Physical cores 12 64
Threads 24 128
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 225 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900X has an age advantage of 8 months, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7662, on the other hand, has a 84.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 5900X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 5900X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 7662, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3513 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900X or EPYC 7662, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.