Apple M3 Pro 12-Core vs Ryzen 9 3950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3950X
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
25.18
+45.5%
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 27 Watt
17.30

Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Apple M3 Pro 12-Core by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3950X and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking198378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.14no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9Apple M3
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)no data
Release date11 June 2019 (5 years ago)30 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3950X and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz4.06 GHz
L1 cache1 MBno data
L2 cache8 MBno data
L3 cache64 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm3 nm
Die size2 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2no data
Number of transistors19,200 million37000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3950X and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3950X 25.18
+45.5%
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 17.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3950X 38758
+45.5%
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 26634

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 3950X 4002
+85%
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 2163

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.18 17.30
Recency 11 June 2019 30 October 2023
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 27 Watt

Ryzen 9 3950X has a 45.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 288.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 3950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Pro 12-Core in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3950X is a desktop processor while Apple M3 Pro 12-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3950X and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
M3 Pro 12-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 711 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 90 votes

Rate Apple M3 Pro 12-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3950X or Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.