Apple M3 Pro 12-Core vs Ryzen 9 3900
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Apple M3 Pro 12-Core by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 3900 and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 278 | 371 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop) | Apple M3 |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 9 October 2019 (4 years ago) | 30 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 3900 and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.748 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 4.06 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 2x 74 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,600 million | 37000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 3900 and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM4 (1331) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.92 | 17.24 |
| Recency | 9 October 2019 | 30 October 2023 |
| Threads | 24 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 27 Watt |
Ryzen 9 3900 has a 15.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 140.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 9 3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Pro 12-Core in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 9 3900 is a desktop processor while Apple M3 Pro 12-Core is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900 and Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
