A4 PRO-7300B vs Ryzen 9 3950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3950X
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
21.95
+2545%

Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms A4 PRO-7300B by a whopping 2545% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2802752
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.77no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Power efficiency8.840.54
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date14 November 2019 (5 years ago)August 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3950X and A4 PRO-7300B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads322
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache64 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm32 nm
Die size2 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3950X and A4 PRO-7300B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FM2
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and A4 PRO-7300B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and A4 PRO-7300B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and A4 PRO-7300B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3-1600
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon HD 8470D
จำนวนพาธไลน์-192
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 9 3950X and A4 PRO-7300B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and A4 PRO-7300B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-DirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and A4 PRO-7300B.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 9 3950X 21.95
+2545%
A4 PRO-7300B 0.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3950X 38571
+2545%
A4 PRO-7300B 1458

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.95 0.83
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 9 3950X has a 2544.6% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

A4 PRO-7300B, on the other hand, has 61.5% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4 PRO-7300B in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X
AMD A4 PRO-7300B
A4 PRO-7300B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 799 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 45 votes

Rate A4 PRO-7300B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 9 3950X and A4 PRO-7300B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.