Ryzen 5 7530U vs Ryzen 9 3900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
20.53
+105%
Ryzen 5 7530U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
10.03

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 5 7530U by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7530U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking275774
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.75no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Power efficiency15.5463.28
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Barcelo-U Refresh (2023)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7530U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7530U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7530U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7530U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7530U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 2000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7530U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900X 20.53
+105%
Ryzen 5 7530U 10.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900X 32614
+105%
Ryzen 5 7530U 15931

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 3900X 1710
+4.6%
Ryzen 5 7530U 1635

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 3900X 9940
+75.7%
Ryzen 5 7530U 5658

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 3900X 3049
+109%
Ryzen 5 7530U 1458

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 3900X 207
Ryzen 5 7530U 231
+11.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 3900X 10498
+64.3%
Ryzen 5 7530U 6390

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 3900X 162
Ryzen 5 7530U 362
+123%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 3900X 1250
Ryzen 5 7530U 1479
+18.3%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 3900X 5316
Ryzen 5 7530U 5339
+0.4%

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 3900X 80935
+113%
Ryzen 5 7530U 37983

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 3900X 225
Ryzen 5 7530U 264
+17.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.53 10.03
Recency 7 July 2019 4 January 2023
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 12
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900X has a 104.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7530U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7530U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7530U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7530U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
Ryzen 5 7530U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5169 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 683 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7530U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900X or Ryzen 5 7530U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.