Ryzen 5 7520U vs Ryzen 9 3900X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
20.54
+255%
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.79

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by a whopping 255% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2691116
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.88no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency15.5536.53
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900X 20.54
+255%
Ryzen 5 7520U 5.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900X 32619
+255%
Ryzen 5 7520U 9198

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 3900X 1710
+43.7%
Ryzen 5 7520U 1190

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 3900X 9950
+164%
Ryzen 5 7520U 3764

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 3900X 3049
+266%
Ryzen 5 7520U 834

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 3900X 207
+22.6%
Ryzen 5 7520U 169

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 3900X 10498
+175%
Ryzen 5 7520U 3821

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 3900X 162
Ryzen 5 7520U 588
+262%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 3900X 1250
+17.3%
Ryzen 5 7520U 1066

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 3900X 5316
+27.6%
Ryzen 5 7520U 4167

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 3900X 80935
+234%
Ryzen 5 7520U 24219

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 3900X 225
+17.6%
Ryzen 5 7520U 191

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.54 5.79
Recency 7 July 2019 20 September 2022
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900X has a 254.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7520U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7520U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5142 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1412 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900X or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.