Celeron 3867U vs Ryzen 9 3900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
21.11
+2122%

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron 3867U by a whopping 2122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2362398
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.75no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date7 July 2019 (4 years ago)1 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499$107
Current price$381 (0.8x MSRP)$341 (3.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache64 MB2 MB
Chip lithography7 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCBGA1356,FC-BGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memory-32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency-900 MHz
Execution Units-12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP-4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900X 21.11
+2122%
Celeron 3867U 0.95

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron 3867U by 2122% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 3900X 32652
+2126%
Celeron 3867U 1467

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron 3867U by 2126% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 3900X 1694
+373%
Celeron 3867U 358

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron 3867U by 373% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 3900X 9922
+1488%
Celeron 3867U 625

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron 3867U by 1488% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 3900X 3049
+2175%
Celeron 3867U 134

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron 3867U by 2175% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.11 0.95
Recency 7 July 2019 1 March 2019
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Cost $499 $107
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3867U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop processor while Celeron 3867U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 3867U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Celeron 3867U
Celeron 3867U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5021 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 20 votes

Rate Celeron 3867U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900X or Celeron 3867U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.