Athlon PRO 300GE vs Ryzen 9 3900X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
20.53
+658%
Athlon PRO 300GE
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.71

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Athlon PRO 300GE by a whopping 658% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and Athlon PRO 300GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2751711
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD Athlon
Power efficiency15.547.33
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)30 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and Athlon PRO 300GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads244
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplierno data34
L1 cache96K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache64 MB4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors19,200 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and Athlon PRO 300GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Athlon PRO 300GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Athlon PRO 300GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Athlon PRO 300GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon Vega 3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900X 20.53
+658%
Athlon PRO 300GE 2.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900X 32612
+657%
Athlon PRO 300GE 4308

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 3900X 1709
+82.4%
Athlon PRO 300GE 937

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 3900X 9939
+420%
Athlon PRO 300GE 1911

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.53 2.71
Recency 7 July 2019 30 September 2019
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900X has a 657.6% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon PRO 300GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon PRO 300GE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and Athlon PRO 300GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
Athlon PRO 300GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5171 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 116 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 300GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900X or Athlon PRO 300GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.