EPYC 7302P vs Core i7-10700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-10700
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.63
EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
21.12
+98.7%

EPYC 7302P outperforms i7-10700 by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking682237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.5315.83
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$340$825
Current price$218 (0.6x MSRP)$864 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-10700 has 80% better value for money than EPYC 7302P.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1200TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-10700 10.63
EPYC 7302P 21.12
+98.7%

EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i7-10700 by 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-10700 16448
EPYC 7302P 32670
+98.6%

EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i7-10700 by 99% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-10700 1586
+41.4%
EPYC 7302P 1122

Core i7-10700 outperforms EPYC 7302P by 41% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-10700 7045
EPYC 7302P 8172
+16%

EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i7-10700 by 16% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.63 21.12
Recency 30 April 2020 7 August 2019
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Cost $340 $825
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 155 Watt

The EPYC 7302P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-10700 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-10700 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7302P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-10700 and EPYC 7302P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-10700
Core i7-10700
AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1115 votes

Rate Core i7-10700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-10700 or EPYC 7302P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.