Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX vs Ryzen 9 3900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 9 3900
2019
12 cores / 24 threads
20.13
+3%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018
24 cores / 48 threads
19.55

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking244263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money36.739.83
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date9 October 2019 (4 years old)2 October 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,299
Current price$388 $1150 (0.9x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3900 has 274% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.

Technical specs

Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache768 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB64 MB
Chip lithography7 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Number of transistorsno data19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4 (1331)Socket TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s93.867 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900 20.13
+3%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 19.55

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 3900 30836
+3%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 29949

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 3% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 3900 1650
+33.7%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 1234

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 34% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 3900 9522
+30.3%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 7309

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 30% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 9 3900 5700
+8.8%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 5241

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 9% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 3900 44191
+17.8%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 37522

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 18% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 3900 13817
+24.8%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 11073

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 25% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 9 3900 31
+43.3%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 22

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 43% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 3900 2804
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 4376
+56.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen 9 3900 by 56% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 3900 197
+13.9%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 173

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 14% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 9 3900 2.22
+16.8%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 1.9

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 17% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 3900 10.4
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 12.2
+17.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen 9 3900 by 17% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 3900 7145
+67.7%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 4261

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 68% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 3900 256
+26.5%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 202

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 26% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 3900 132
+13.2%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 117

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX by 13% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.13 19.55
Recency 9 October 2019 2 October 2018
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 24 48
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 250 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Ryzen 9 3900
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 556 votes

Rate AMD Ryzen 9 3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900 or Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.