Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Ryzen 9 3900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
20.12
+24.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
16.15

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking289439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency28.2352.59
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date24 September 2019 (5 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache768 KB512 KB
L2 cache6 MB8 MB
L3 cache64 MB16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm4 nm
Die size2x 74 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors7,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900 20.12
+24.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 16.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900 30796
+24.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 24711

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 3900 1679
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 2150
+28.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 3900 9571
+0.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 9521

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 3900 2804
+26.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 2218

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 3900 197
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 265
+34.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 3900 10190
+2.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 9968

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 3900 179
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 237
+32.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 3900 1246
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 1853
+48.7%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 3900 5134
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 5900
+14.9%

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 3900 75612
+29.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 58386

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 3900 227
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 283
+24.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.12 16.15
Recency 24 September 2019 3 May 2023
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900 has a 24.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Ryzen 9 3900
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 611 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 44 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900 or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.